Pennsylvania Casinos Petition State Supreme Court to Declare Slot Taxes Unconstitutional
Posted on: July 30, 2024, 04:58h.
Last updated on: July 31, 2024, 10:27h.
Several Pennsylvania casinos have petitioned the state’s Supreme Court to declare that the 48% – 54% tax that the land-based casinos pay on their gross slot machine revenue is unconstitutional.
In a petition for review filed this week by the operating entities of 12 of Pennsylvania’s 17 brick-and-mortar casinos, the plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment in their favor. The casinos point to the fact that lower state courts have ruled that the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) has no legal authority to regulate controversial skill games commonly found in nonprofit clubs, restaurants and bars, convenience stores, gas stations, and other retail businesses.
Those court decisions have also barred law enforcement from seizing the machines and the Department of Revenue from collecting taxes on the games that look and operate closely to casino slots. The slight operational difference between the games commonly branded “Pennsylvania Skill” is that the player must identify a winning payline. A casino slot does that automatically for the player and pays out the win.
$1B at Stake
The petition for review comes as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in June announced it would review an appeal brought by state Attorney General Michelle Henry (D). Henry asked the high court to consider a lower court’s opinion that skill games are not slot machines.
Last year, a Commonwealth Court upheld the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas’ decision that since a player’s financial outcome playing a skill game isn’t solely dependent on chance but involves elements of aptitude, the Pennsylvania Gaming Act doesn’t apply.
Henry and several district attorneys contend that skill games are only cleverly manufactured illegal, unregulated gambling apparatuses. The casinos in their lawsuit allege that the state must uniformly tax all gambling games.
There is no basis for requiring licensed entities to pay about half of their slot machine revenue to the Commonwealth while allowing unlicensed entities to pay no tax on such revenue,” the complaint argues.
The operating companies of the following casinos are involved in the litigation: Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, Hollywood Casino York, Hollywood Casino Morgantown, Hollywood Casino at The Meadows, Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia, Live! Casino Pittsburgh, Parx Casino, Parx Casino Shippensburg, Wind Creek Bethlehem, Harrah’s Philadelphia, Rivers Casino Philadelphia, and Rivers Casino Pittsburgh.
Pennsylvania casinos paid the state about $1 billion last year from their retail slots.
Tax Proposals
The skill game interests have asked to be taxed through legislation and provided a regulatory environment. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) suggested a 42% tax in his February budget address. Bipartisan legislation that’s currently stalled in the Harrisburg capital while the legality of the games plays out has floated a 16% tax.
The skill game lobby argues that its machines don’t cut into the casino industry’s business and provide supplemental income for small businesses that has helped counter inflation and kept people employed.
The PGCB reported in January that 2023 brick-and-mortar slot revenue totaled $2.46 billion, an all-time high that’s 3% higher than what was collected in 2022. But Pennsylvania is also home to more slot machines than ever before after several new casinos opened in recent years. In January 2023, Parx opened its Shippensburg satellite casino.
With the state’s high tax on slot revenue, the American Gaming Association says Pennsylvania generates more government proceeds from the gaming terminals than any other state. That robust tax stream, or river, is now in jeopardy of being dammed should the Supreme Court agree with the plaintiff casinos that if skill games aren’t taxed, nor should casino slots.
Related News Articles
Anti-Gambling Group Adds Voice to Florida Sports Betting Case
Pennsylvania Skill Games Ruling Appealed to State Supreme Court
Most Popular
Sphere Threat Prompts Dolan to End Oak View Agreement
MGM Springfield Casino Evacuated Following Weekend Blaze
This Pizza & Wings Costs $653 at Allegiant VIP Box in Vegas!
Atlantic City Casinos Experience Haunting October as Gaming Win Falls 8.5%
Most Commented
-
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: Casinos Pump in Extra Oxygen
November 15, 2024 — 4 Comments— -
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: The Final Resting Place of Whiskey Pete
October 25, 2024 — 3 Comments— -
Chukchansi Gold Casino Hit with Protests Against Disenrollment
October 21, 2024 — 3 Comments—
Last Comments ( 2 )
Economists, Lucy Dadayan and Earl Grinols, have proven that casinos, lotteries, and sports betting do not lift local economies. As commercial gambling forces its way into our social fabric with false promises of revenue, we are forced to watch Eli and Peyton Manning, and Kevin Hart smiling to tell us how much fun gambling is. Gambling is the new tobacco. It has always been a lie about how it can make us cool and improve our lives. Let’s leave gambling in Las Vegas and Atlantic City if we must. But, America, please stop believing ads and politicians who say Casinos bring revenue and jobs. Their revenue is from your neighbors’ gambling losses and the jobs are low-paying which actually diminishes the local economy. Add to that increased crime, increased problem gambling and gambling addiction, and increased pollution as these 24/7 operations foul the air and water and produce huge piles of solid waste and water waste. Casinos drag down any neighborhood. Let’s stop falling for their lies.
According to the Constitution, the government must treat like things alike. Skill games and slot machines are essentially the same thing, so if skill games are not taxed, then slot machines in casinos cannot be taxed either. The casinos' petition relies on the same principle that the Federal Supreme Court relied on when it determined that sports gambling cannot be federally prohibited in any state if the federal government permits it to take place in Nevada (see Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association).