Arizona Proposes Tribal Sports Betting Bill Allowing for Both On and Off Sovereign Land Wagering
Posted on: January 25, 2019, 02:30h.
Last updated on: January 26, 2019, 07:35h.
In Arizona, a ground-breaking new proposal could lead to legalized tribal sports betting in the state. Introduced this week in the state legislature, the bill would allow tribes to offer sports wagering in limited off-reservation locations, as well as within tribal casinos.
Senate Bill SB 1158 was introduced by State Sen. Sonny Borrelli (R-Lake Havasu City) and State Rep. Leo Biasiucci (R-Lake Havasu City) and Mark Finchem (R-Tucson).
Frances Sjoberg — a partner in Phoenix-based law firm Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie’s Tribal Affairs, Gaming and Business Transactions practice group — called the proposal an “innovative approach.”
“This is the first state legislation for limited operation of sports betting by tribes,” Sjoberg told Casino.org.
Given that tribes in Arizona are experienced casino operators, “I don’t think the tribes will have any particular challenges,” Sjoberg said. Although rural tribes may have to overcome the fact that their more remote locations may draw fewer customers, Sjoberg points out that the bill allows for off-reservation gaming.
Going Off the Grid
Under the new measure, off-reservation sports betting would be offered through kiosks or similar machines located in licensed bars or private clubs, much like those operated by service groups such as the VFW and Elks lodges.
Given the number of tribal casinos in the state, the proposal could have a major impact: Arizona has 24 Indian casinos in compacts. Another five tribes have compacts without casinos, according to the Arizona Department of Gaming.
As of last November, cumulative tribal contributions from gaming revenue to the state through the Arizona Benefits Fund was almost $1.3 billion. Additionally, tribes have made contributions to cities, towns, and counties of their choosing in the Grand Canyon State, totalling over $163.7 million, as of November, 2018.
Total tribal contributions as of November have been $1.45 billion since the compacts began in 2004.
Under the bill, off-site betting would be regulated by the Arizona Department of Gaming, which already regulates tribal casinos.
Currently, gaming on reservations is regulated by both state regulators and self-regulated within each tribe. With tribal off-reservation gaming to be regulated by the state, Sjoberg said this should present no problem, as tribes are used to working with state officials.
In Arizona, all tribes have one form of a compact, which includes revenue-sharing with the state. The money collected is earmarked for specific areas, including education and wildlife.
Tribal taxes on off-reservation betting would be at 6.75 percent of revenue, the same tax rate on casino GGR that Nevada pays.
Getting Real
The bill has now been sent to Arizona’s Senate Rules Committee to be reviewed by state legislators. The public could testify in hearings, and Sjoberg says some social conservatives — who often oppose any form of gambling — may choose to speak out against the bill.
Also likely weighing in will be the state Attorney General’s (AG) office. A spokesperson for Attorney General Mark Brnovich told Casino.org on Thursday they were “not consulted on the bill, but we are currently reviewing the legislation.”
Lawmakers may choose to amend the bill as well. If it’s ultimately approved by the legislature, Governor Doug Ducey must sign it into law. Finally, individual tribes will decide if they want to offer sports betting, which Sjoberg says is not an automatic assumption.
“Each tribe would determine for itself if and how it wants to participate,” Sjoberg told Casino.org. “We don’t yet know what the tribal response will be.”
State regulators will still need to license any sports betting operators, after which if they choose to go off of sovereign land, tribes could find locations with existing bars or private clubs that already have liquor licenses to serve alcohol, and sign leases or rental agreements with them.
But nothing in the bill would prevent tribes from opening their own off-reservation bars where they could put the kiosks, Sjoberg said. Nor is there anything which would limit the number of kiosks put in any one bar or club, beyond the overall total number agreed to in a compact between a tribe and the state.
One major point with the bill is that it continues to keep “tribal exclusivity” when it comes to gambling in the state, Sjoberg said.
If approved — and if enough Arizona tribes decide to dive into sports betting — other states may try similar initiatives, too, Sjoberg confirmed, especially in those with large tribal gaming operations.
The measure says that no other person or organization beyond recognized tribes can operate sports betting in the state. Moreover, it prevents wagering on NCAA (college) sports.
Related News Articles
Most Popular
FTC: Casino Resort Fees Must Be Included in Upfront Hotel Rates
Genovese Capo Sentenced for Illegal Gambling on Long Island
NBA Referees Expose Sports Betting Abuse Following Steve Kerr Meltdown
UPDATE: Former Resorts World & MGM Grand Prez Loses Gaming License
Most Commented
-
UPDATE: Whiskey Pete’s Casino Near Las Vegas Closes
December 20, 2024 — 31 Comments— -
Caesars Virginia in Danville Now Accepting Hotel Room Reservations
November 27, 2024 — 9 Comments— -
UPDATE: Former Resorts World & MGM Grand Prez Loses Gaming License
December 19, 2024 — 8 Comments— -
FTC: Casino Resort Fees Must Be Included in Upfront Hotel Rates
December 17, 2024 — 7 Comments—
Last Comment ( 1 )
Put sportsbetting alongside horse race betting and remove it from the mostly dingy taverns and into the many vast Indian Casinos. Give Players Cards to the gamblers, just as is currently done with slot players, so they can earn rewards. Stop letting the Indian gambling interests tell us how we must spend our money! As it has been for years, many Arizona players spend their sports dollars at internet casinos based in other countries, and receive nice rebates for their play. Arizona gives sports players zero comps, and the Indian Lobby doesn't want it in their casinos because it would occupy square footage where slots machines could be sitting. The scenic state of Arizona it better than this.