First Light Casino: Taunton, Mass. Residents Strike Back in Fight with Mashpee
Posted on: January 5, 2022, 07:32h.
Last updated on: January 5, 2022, 03:34h.
The Mashpee Wampanoag tribe is facing a renewed legal threat to its ambition to build the $1 billion First Light Casino in Taunton, Massachusetts.
A group of Taunton residents have asked a federal judge in Boston to reopen the lawsuit that derailed the project in 2016.
The plaintiffs were initially successful in their claim that the Obama administration had erred by taking a parcel of land in Taunton, and one in Mashpee, into trust for the tribe as its sovereign reservation.
They argued based on a 2009 Supreme Court judgment known as the Carcieri Decision. That ruling prevented the US government from taking land into trust for tribes that were federally recognized after the enactment of the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934.
Stripped of Sovereignty
The judge, and later the Trump administration, agreed. Despite being descended from the Wampanoags who broke bread with the Pilgrims at the first Thanksgiving, the Mashpee were only recognized in 2007.
The process began to strip the tribe of its reservation, and with that, its right to organize gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA).
But in June 2020, US District Judge Paul Friedman reversed the 2016 decision, which he called “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and contrary to law.”
The Trump administration appealed the ruling. But earlier this year, the new administration withdrew the complaint and affirmed the Obama-era decision.
The federal government’s exercise of jurisdiction began as early as the 1820s when the United States considered the Mashpee in the context of determining whether to apply the contemporaneous removal policy,” wrote Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Bryan Newland.
“The United States excluded the tribe from forced removal west of the Mississippi River, thereby protecting Mashpee land from non-Indian settlement,” he added.
‘Adjudication Time’
Now, the group of residents want the court to take up two counts from their original complaint that were put on hold back in 2016. The first is the claim that the Mashpee cannot claim historical ties to the land in Taunton, a prerequisite for the process of taking land into trust.
Second is the claim that two parcels of land separated by physical distance cannot be one reservation. Mashpee is on Cape Cod, around 40 miles away from Taunton. And again, the plaintiffs want an order removing the land from trust.
“The time for adjudication is now,” the residents said in their filing. “Plaintiffs respectfully request this court to restore the administratively closed counts … and otherwise reopen the case to permit additional filings for adjudication.”
The 2016 decision led to catastrophic financial setbacks for the tribe. But in December, The Taunton Daily Gazette reported plans for the First Light Casino were back on, and that Malaysian casino giant Genting was still on board and financing the project.
Related News Articles
Most Popular
IGT Discloses Cybersecurity Incident, Financial Impact Not Clear
Sphere Threat Prompts Dolan to End Oak View Agreement
This Pizza & Wings Costs $653 at Allegiant VIP Box in Vegas!
MGM Springfield Casino Evacuated Following Weekend Blaze
Most Commented
-
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: Casinos Pump in Extra Oxygen
November 15, 2024 — 4 Comments— -
Chukchansi Gold Casino Hit with Protests Against Disenrollment
October 21, 2024 — 3 Comments— -
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: The Final Resting Place of Whiskey Pete
October 25, 2024 — 3 Comments—
Last Comments ( 3 )
The people of Taunton by a majority voted in favor of this casino and it was passed by the majority. This project would be the best thing that has come along for some time in Taunton. Why don't the few that are against this get a life and move on . Maybe the opposition would prefer Marijuana , smoke shops and homeless shelters..We the people have spoken our desires and it is not up to a small percentage of nay Sayers to circumvent our vote. I wonder how the trouble makers would fare if it were not for their out of town money contributions and backers to pay their way in legal expenses?
Getting it wrong is an understatement. 1. You cannot strip away something they never ever had. 2. Financial setbacks? Don't get into bed with a money laundering outfit like Genting and they could have done better. 3. Maybe the federal conviction of one prior digraced, tribal chairman and indictment of a second has something to do with it also.
I have yet to see a reporter get this story right. Journalism never fails to disappoint.