MGM Resorts Class Action Lawsuit Certified in Nevada Federal Court
Posted on: October 21, 2022, 09:47h.
Last updated on: October 21, 2022, 10:10h.
A class action lawsuit brought against MGM Resorts International by workers of Nevada’s largest employer has been given the green light by a federal judge in Nevada’s district court.
Nevada District Magistrate Judge Nancy Koppe this week certified a class including more than 20K MGM Resorts International workers. They allege they lost millions of dollars a year investing in their company-sponsored 401(k) retirement savings plan. They say the company failed to prevent fund administrators from investing in shoddy mutual funds that charge exorbitant management fees.
The lawsuit, brought collectively by three MGM employees — Eboni Lucas, Jeremy Goard, and Shawndrea Stafford — alleges claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) for breaches of fiduciary duty. The plaintiffs argue that MGM’s corporate failure to more closely monitor its 401(k) program financially hurt participating workers.
“The Plan suffered millions of dollars of losses due to excessive costs and lower net investment returns,” the complaint alleged.
The lawsuit argues that if MGM complied with its fiduciary obligations and better oversaw its 401(k) plan and associated investments, workers’ retirement accounts would be much richer today.
Case Continued
Koppe ruled that the lawsuit against MGM Resorts has merit and, therefore, will proceed as class action litigation. Anyone participating in the company’s 401(k) can now join the group lawsuit regarding the alleged high-cost mutual funds and excessive management fees.
ERISA, a federal law enacted in 1974, imposes strict fiduciary duties on employers offering retirement plans for workers. As a designated fiduciary, ERISA requires that MGM act “solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries.”
The class action lawsuit contends that MGM and its 401(k) administrative committee did not act solely in the worker’s best interest.
The prudent selection and monitoring of the investment options by the committee is crucial to fulfill the purpose of the plan, which is, among other things, to enable ‘eligible employees to accumulate and invest savings on a tax-advantaged basis in order to provide additional income and security upon retirement,'” the lawsuit contends.
The plaintiffs argue that MGM, for unknown reasons, allowed higher-cost investment vehicles to be offered in the 401(k) plan despite other funds offering similar investment products at lower costs. The lawsuit says the “overarching questions of law” regarding the suit boil down to determining whether MGM breached its fiduciary duties.
Plaintiffs allege the company did so by failing to investigate the availability of lower-cost share classes of certain mutual funds in the plan and failing to monitor or control the “compensation paid for recordkeeping and administration services.”
Tenths of a Percent Matter
The class action lawsuit says that when dealing with so-called “jumbo plans,” typically 401(k) employer programs with more than $1 billion, fiduciary importance is heightened.
“When jumbo plans … have options which approach the retail cost of shares for individual investors or are simply more expensive than the average or median institutional shares for that type of investment, a careful review of the plan and each option is needed for the fiduciaries to fulfill their obligations to the plan participants,” the lawsuit added.
Mutual funds typically come with a fee that covers the management and administration of the fund. An expense ratio of .75% means a plan participant will pay $7.50 annually for every $1,000 in assets in the fund.
The lawsuit against MGM claims many of the company’s 401(k) plan options came with fund fees of more than 1%.
Related News Articles
MGM Springfield Sacked Diversity Chief Levies Lawsuit Against Casino, Ex-Boss
Las Vegas Judge Orders Mental Eval for Alleged MGM Solar Plant Terrorist
Most Popular
IGT Discloses Cybersecurity Incident, Financial Impact Not Clear
Sphere Threat Prompts Dolan to End Oak View Agreement
This Pizza & Wings Costs $653 at Allegiant VIP Box in Vegas!
MGM Springfield Casino Evacuated Following Weekend Blaze
Most Commented
-
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: Casinos Pump in Extra Oxygen
November 15, 2024 — 4 Comments— -
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: The Final Resting Place of Whiskey Pete
October 25, 2024 — 3 Comments— -
Chukchansi Gold Casino Hit with Protests Against Disenrollment
October 21, 2024 — 3 Comments—
Last Comments ( 31 )
I want in
I want in
I want In
I want in too
I want in too !
What law firm is handling this class action?
So let me get this straight. The DUNE-er Bet: 25 Million against MGM, that is MGM will lose in court to the 401 Claimants. I like this, when do I pick up check???
Keep fighting employees. We were retiring with a whole lot of promises and the company bailed out. Watch their lawyers and judges. They are just as crooked. We had a judge Drain of new york and boy did he screw the Atlantic and Pacific supermarket workers. We wish you luck from New York.
I was not giving my retirement working 13 years being Grand I said I didn't sign the right papers for the Union
Corporate greed and idiocracy at work
I retired from the MGM after 28 years of employment in June and transferred all of my 401k into my Schwab account. Am I eligible to join this class action lawsuit?
yep.
How do I join the group lawsuit? I had my 401K for over 25 years and just recently retired and rolled it into my financial company portfolio.
This is incompetent mis management of greedy corporate MGM!
I want in