PokerStars Blocks Play Money Games in Washington State, Federal Judgment Unnerves Social Gaming Industry
Posted on: April 9, 2018, 10:30h.
Last updated on: April 9, 2018, 02:13h.
PokerStars has blocked free-to-play games in Washington State. According to the State Gambling Commission, the online poker giant is one of several providers of “freemium” social casino-style games that opted to withdraw services to state residents last week, following a federal court judgment on the legality of the Big Fish social casino app.
On March 28, the Ninth Circuit US Court of appeals reversed a district court’s dismissal of a lawsuit that accused Big Fish of providing illegal gambling under Washington State law.
Judge Milan D. Smith of the Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals ruled that the virtual play-money chips used in Big Fish’s Casino could be regarded as being “something of value,” and therefore constituted a gambling “stake.” All forms of online gambling are illegal in the state.
Big Fish to Fry
“Since the decision was published, we have become aware that some online social gaming websites, including PokerStars, have proactively made the business decision to deny Washington residents access to their sites,” said the Gambling Commission in an official statement.
“We are not a party to the civil court case, we did not testify in the case, and we did not order these sites to discontinue free online play for Washington residents,” the Commission’s statement continued. “Customers with concerns should contact these websites directly.”
The initial court case was brought by a Cheryl Kater, a former Big Fish player, who said she had spent over $1,000 on virtual chips while playing the casino games. She claimed the games violated several Washington State statutes, including the Recovery of Money Lost at Gambling Act (RMLGA) and the Washington Consumer Protection Act.
Value Judgment
Since Washington law defines gambling as “risking something of value on the outcome of a contest of chance or a future contingent event not under the person’s control or influence to receive something of value in the event of a certain outcome,” the case hinged on whether virtual play chips were a thing of value.
While the chips have no direct monetary worth, the judge favored a broad definition, ruling that “value” could be the “extension of a service, entertainment or a privilege of playing at a game or scheme without charge.”
It’s a ruling that will send a chill down the spine of the multibillion-dollar social casino industry. While the judgment related specifically to Washington State law, that state’s definition of gambling is generally accepted, and the phrase “something of value” is found in gaming laws across America.
Kentucky-based Churchill Downs, which owns Big Fish Casino, is expected to appeal.
Related News Articles
Boyaa Interactive CEO Imprisoned in China on Bribery Charges
Flutter Will Fight $1.3 Billion Kentucky Ruling In Stars Group Poker Case.
Most Popular
LOST VEGAS: Wynn’s $28 Million Popeye
MGM Springfield Casino Evacuated Following Weekend Blaze
Mark Wahlberg’s Latest Acting Role: Las Vegas Gym Operator
Sphere Threat Prompts Dolan to End Oak View Agreement
Most Commented
-
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: The Final Resting Place of Whiskey Pete
October 25, 2024 — 3 Comments— -
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: A Roulette Color Can Be ‘Due’
October 11, 2024 — 2 Comments— -
Iowa Casinos Push Back Against Cedar Rapids Resort Pitch
October 7, 2024 — 2 Comments— -
Las Vegas Sports Bettor Claims William Hill Screwed Him Out of $40K PGA Bet
October 22, 2024 — 2 Comments—
Last Comments ( 4 )
Thanks for ruining my evenings of playing VR poker with monopoly money hurting nobody. Thanks.
This has got to be one of the best examples of what kind of judges we have in the States. I feel the pain all 'cause I'm in Oregon and am knocked off also. On a side note, I have never purchased "play money" after being with Texas Holdem sites for many years and can't quite get my head around someone complaining after being stupid enough to spend a $1000.00 and turn around and whine. OH well....
its only play money that I play with, so why should this be called gambling. I consider it a game of fun and enjoyment. You have taken my only type of entertainment away from a disabled person. Thanks state of Washington.
This is the dumbest decision and reasoning I’ve ever heard of. Play money now has value?!? Since when?? Why not take away all gaming on devices then while we’re at it? It’s illegal to get to the next level on Candy Crush and games like it because that is highly valued. Remove that evil game!