Polymarket Leads World Cup Odds as Prediction Markets Capture 27% of Betting Volume

Key Points

  • Polymarket outpriced legacy sportsbooks across all 104 World Cup matches, averaging an implied vig of just 2.7%
  • The trend marks the second straight tentpole sporting event in which prediction markets offered superior pricing to traditional operators
  • Estimates show prediction market trading volume captured 27% of legal U.S. sports wagers during the tournament

Polymarket offered superior pricing throughout the World Cup, marking the second consecutive major sporting event in which a prediction market exchange beat legacy sportsbooks on price.

Polymarket was the pricing leader during the World Cup, beating prediction market and sportsbook rivals. (Image: Getty Images)

Citizens Equity Research analyst Jordan Bender says that helped by lower fees, Polymarket offered the best pricing across each of the World Cup’s 104 games with an average implied vig of 2.7%.

If Polymarket is removed from the equation, DraftKings and FanDuel — the two largest domestic sportsbook operators — had the best pricing in 38 and seven games, respectively, according to the analyst.

Bender has consistently tracked pricing data since the 2025 NFL season, and while yes/no exchanges had some bumps on that front during U.S. football season, considerable strides are being made.

“We believe this improvement reflects higher trading volumes, deeper market-maker participation, and increased competition among liquidity providers,” says the analyst. “As liquidity grows and spreads tighten, prediction markets become competitive with traditional sportsbooks in legal sports betting states, creating a virtuous cycle in which better pricing attracts additional trading activity, and in turn further improves liquidity and odds.”

He points out that the World Cup and the NCAA Tournament mark two consecutive “tentpole” events in which prediction markets featured superior pricing relative to traditional sportsbooks.

Does Prediction Market Pricing Advantage Matter?

The answer to that question boils down to the type of customer. As Bender points out, sharp bettors, many of whom have gravitated to prediction markets, and market makers are price-sensitive and will scrap for every basis point in advantage they can get.

Conversely, most retail bettors, also known as “recs” to the pros on prediction markets, are usually less price-sensitive. That cohort of customers is more apt to focus on issues such as accessibility in their respective states, brand awareness and customer interface.

Following the World Cup, there’s likely to be a seasonal volume lull for both sportsbooks and yes/no exchanges, but the next pricing test for the latter arrives in about six weeks as turnover will mount in advance of the start of the 2026 NFL season.

“While trading volumes are likely to moderate during the seasonal lull before the NFL season, we expect the next meaningful test of this pricing advantage to occur as liquidity builds heading into September,” adds Bender. “If prediction markets continue to outperform sportsbooks during the NFL season, it would provide additional evidence that the pricing advantage is structural rather than event-driven.”

World Cup Was Volume Boon for Prediction Markets

With the World Cup in the books, two key takeaways emerge: the tournament served as both a massive customer acquisition catalyst and a major volume driver for prediction markets.

Daily active U.S. users on prediction platforms swelled following the tournament’s kickoff. Meanwhile, H2 Gambling Capital estimates that prediction market activity accounted for 27% of all regulated sports wagering in the U.S. over the course of the competition.

With that 27% figure in mind, it remains critical to distinguish between exchange volume and traditional sportsbook handle. Prediction market turnover measures both sides of a trade—buys and sells—whereas sportsbook handle represents the gross dollar amount wagered.

Todd Shriber
Todd Shriber Financial Reporter

Todd Shriber is a senior news reporter covering gaming financials, casino business, stocks, and mergers and acquisitions for Casino.org.

Todd got his start in financial markets as a reporter with Bloomberg News. Later, he became a trader at a Southern California-based long/short hedge fund, where he specialized in the trading sector and international ETFs leading up to and during the financial crisis. He joined Casino.org in 2019.

Currently, Todd analyzes, researches, and writes on ETFs for various web-based publications and financial services firms. Shriber has been featured and quoted in Barron's, CNBC.com, and The Wall Street Journal. His work can also be found on Benzinga, ETF Daily News, ETF Trends, MarketWatch, Fox Business, and Nasdaq.com.

He currently resides in Las Vegas, where he enjoys golf and taking his black lab to the dog park. He's also an avid sports fan and likes to wager on college football and the NBA. You can also find him at the three-card poker and roulette table, even though he knows better.

Contact Todd at todd.shriber@casino.org.

Comments icon

Conversation (0)

+ Add a comment

Be the first to comment on this article.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.