Las Vegas Karaoke Bar Sued to Tune of $264M for Skirting Royalties
Posted on: November 22, 2023, 05:58h.
Last updated on: November 23, 2023, 11:24h.
Kamu Ultra Karaoke, a nightclub in the Grand Canal Shoppes at The Venetian, is being sued for $264M by an L.A.-based record company.
Sybersound Records — a label owned and distributed worldwide by Universal Music Group — claims the Vegas Strip lounge illegally uses the instrumental music it licenses by streaming it for free through YouTube.
Sybersound, which does business at Party Tyme Karaoke, said it controls an instrumental catalog of 75K hit songs, including material from Taylor Swift, Lady Gaga, Bruno Mars, Justin Bieber, Ariana Grande, Rihanna, and Katy Perry.
The lawsuit claims Kamu has played Sybersound’s copyrighted catalog without permission since opening in July 2020. The $264 million in damages and attorney’s fees that it seeks is in part based on the club’s hefty karaoke room rental charges.
The 17K square-foot lounge operates 40 different rooms, which it rents to groups of 6-40. Some of the rooms cost $4K a night for parties after 10 p.m., according to the lawsuit, which also asks the court for a restraining order to prevent Kamu Ultra Karaoke’s further use of its material.
“Individuals can enjoy Party Tyme and other karaoke content through YouTube in their own homes and at their own private events,” said Peter Haviland, counsel for Sybersound Records, in a statement. “Commercial businesses, on the other hand, cannot exploit this content and make big profits from it without paying a fair subscription license for that commercial use.”
Name Game
The three-count copyright infringement lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, names Kamu Ultra Karaoke, club owner Jeff Kim, Venetian parent company Apollo Global Management Inc., and Grand Canal Shoppes operator Brookfield Properties.
A spokesperson for Apollo told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that naming Apollo or The Venetian in the lawsuit was “a blatant grab for publicity,” since neither entity owns, operates, or controls the Grand Canal Shoppes or its tenants — a fact many tourists learned last week after Brookfield Properties laid off all of the indoor mall’s remaining living statues and musical entertainment.
Related News Articles
Shuttered Las Vegas Gentlemen’s Club Euphoric Sues Rapper Blueface
Las Vegas Strip Getting $50M New Nightclub
Broadway Hit ‘SIX’ to Open at Venetian Las Vegas March 21
First Las Vegas Sphere Joke Falls Flat as Late Night Talk Shows Return
Most Popular
This Pizza & Wings Costs $653 at Allegiant VIP Box in Vegas!
Sphere Threat Prompts Dolan to End Oak View Agreement
MGM Springfield Casino Evacuated Following Weekend Blaze
Atlantic City Casinos Experience Haunting October as Gaming Win Falls 8.5%
Most Commented
-
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: Casinos Pump in Extra Oxygen
— November 15, 2024 — 4 Comments -
Chukchansi Gold Casino Hit with Protests Against Disenrollment
— October 21, 2024 — 3 Comments
Most Read
Fertitta Unlikely to Pursue Wynn Takeover, Says Analyst
Last Comments ( 2 )
To claim they hold no responsibility is wrong. They provide everything, the room, the access to the music and equipment. They are responsible for the illegal use of YouTube. The bar IS selling them karaoke. It’s a karaoke bar, and as such they are providing them with Karaoke Rooms. It’s kind of dumb to assume that it’s them using their own smart devices and YouTube accounts.
Just like the casino isn't responsible for the tenants in the mall, the club carries no liability for its patrons using YouTube in a private room. They rented. The bar isn't selling them karaoke, it sells them a room with TVs in it and speakers. If they choose to use the TV and their smart devices, logged into their own YouTube account and play the song. It's their own private use.